CLIMATE CRISIS: Getting to ‘net-zero’ carbon emissions a ‘heavy, but necessary lift’

National Academies of Sciences Makes Recommendations for Addressing Climate Change in ‘no ordinary report’

FREE SUBSCRIBE to WestVirginiaVille’s e-mail newsletter: photo-illustration. | From Bobby Lee Messer video of John Amos power plant in Nitro WV.

By Perry Bryant | for | march9.2021

In a recently released report, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine (Academy) recommends that the United States adopt a modest carbon tax, use clean energy standards and energy efficiencies measures, as well as adopting other policies, in order to achieve net-zero emissions in the U.S. by 2050.

Net-zero emissions means that we will continue to emit carbon dioxide (CO2) into the atmosphere even in 2050 — but we will be taking out of the atmosphere at least as much CO2, through planting trees for example, as we emit. Net-zero emissions, while an ambitious goal, is what is needed if we are to avoid the worst impacts of global warming.

This is no ordinary report. Many consider the Academy to be the nation’s leading scientific organization, and their recommendations deserve careful consideration.

Net-zero emissions, while an ambitious goal, is what is needed if we are to avoid the worst impacts of global warming.

The proposed carbon tax is paid by CO2 emitters and passed along to consumers in the form of higher energy costs. It starts at $40 for every ton of CO2 emitted, and increases by 5 percent a year. A portion of the tax would be rebated to low-income families to offset their higher utility bills.

The Academy rejected a $100-per-ton CO2 tax — which many economists believe is needed in order to de-carbonize the U.S. economy — because of the negative impact much higher energy costs would have on energy consumers. The recommended clean energy standard for electrical utilities would require CO2 emissions to be reduced by 75 percent by 2030 and to net zero by 2050.

Currently, West Virginia generates more than 90 percent of its electricity from coal, the most carbon-intensive fuel used in generating electricity. Achieving a 75 percent reduction in less than 10 years is a heavy, but necessary, lift.

Electric vehicles will require an extensive charging infrastructure, replacing corner gas stations with charging stations. | Colorized photo by Andreas Dress on Unsplash

The Academy recommends that 50 percent of all new car and SUV sales and 30 percent of trucks sales be electric vehicles by 2030. All these electric vehicles will require development of an extensive charging infrastructure: think replacing the gas stations that are currently on every other corner with charging stations for electrical vehicles.

The proposed energy efficiency standards include requiring new buildings to be designed and constructed to use 50 percent less energy.

Creating manufacturing jobs in solar, wind and batteries is essential, in my opinion, if addressing climate change is going to attract wide-spread support among Americans.

The Academy also recommends revitalizing American manufacturing to produce high-paying jobs with solid benefits. Creating manufacturing jobs in solar, wind and batteries is essential, in my opinion, if addressing climate change is going to attract wide-spread support among Americans.

These policies proposals are designed to achieve the overarching strategy of:

  • Emphasizing energy efficiency.
  • Removing carbon dioxide from the production of electricity.
  • Then, electrifying as much of the U.S. economy as possible. This includes the transportation system (electrical vehicles); the heating and cooling of buildings (installing heat pumps); and heavy industries (wherever it’s possible to switch from fossil fuels to electricity).

Consider for a moment the magnitude of the changes that are being proposed in order to avoid the worst impacts of climate change. In the next 15 to 30 years, we will have to replace the current coal- and most of the gas-fired power plants with energy from sources other than fossil fuels: solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, and nuclear.

And we also have to replace all the energy that we currently use driving our cars, SUVs and trucks; as well as replacing the energy currently used in heating and cooling our homes and commercial properties; and replace the energy used in making everything from aluminum to pharmaceuticals.

Colorized photo of windmills at the Mountaineer Wind Energy Center wind farm in West Virginia, on Backbone Mountain in Preston and Tucker counties. | image

Contentious infrastructure

Given the massive expansion of the use of electricity, it’s not surprising that the Academy recommends statutory changes in order to upgrade the electrical grid making it more resilient, and to make it easier to construct significant miles of new transmission lines.

The report also stresses the need to preserve the opportunities for meaningful public input in siting these transmission lines and other infrastructures.

The need to build massive new miles of high-voltage transmission lines can be reduced through installing rooftop solar, which the report barely mentions. Solar Neighbors (SUN), a nonprofit organization that supports solar installation, has begun an initiative to install solar on 30 million homes. If successful, that would be about one in four houses in America, and would reduce the need for some of the proposed new high-voltage transmission lines.

Another contentious infrastructure recommended by the Academy is the construction of CO2 pipelines to transport captured CO2 from industrial plants to places where it can be sequestered underground. Some existing natural gas pipelines could be repurposed to carry CO2 reducing the need for construction of new pipelines, although this will only ameliorate, not eliminate, the need for new CO2 pipelines.

These intrusive infrastructures need to be weighed against the benefits of adopting clean energy.

The move from fossil fuels will put an end to mountaintop removal, end Black Lung Disease, greatly reduce the need for fracking, and vastly improve air quality, particularly in our inner cities

Greenbottom WV clover. | image

We will not only mitigate the effects of climate change — less severe hurricanes, fewer wildfires, shorter droughts, etc. — but also put an end to mountaintop removal, end black lung, greatly reduce the need for fracking, and vastly improve air quality, particularly in our inner cities.

The stake are extremely high. In February 2021, Harvard University and other universities, for example, released a report linking almost one in every five premature deaths worldwide in 2018 with fossil fuels emissions, significantly more than was previously thought..

GET REPORT: Download a .PDF copy of the Academy report, “Accelerating Decarbonization of the U.S. Energy System, at

The report states that the transition to net-zero emissions by 2050 “provides an opportunity to build a more competitive U.S. economy, to increase the availability of high-quality jobs, to build an energy system without the social injustices that permeate the current system, and to allow those individuals and businesses that are marginalized today to share equitably in future benefits.”

That is a wonderful vision. But it will not be easy.

Perry Bryant is the principle author of “A Citizen’s Guide to Climate Change: The Causes, Impacts and Potential Solutions.” (Related sept21.2020 WVPB story about the guide at this link .) The Guide was written by West Virginians for West Virginians. Perry is one of the founders of the West Virginia Climate Alliance, a coalition of environmental organizations, faith-based organizations, civil rights groups, and young adults. Perry also chairs the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy’s Climate Change Committee.

Video Production Support by WVPure, extra-strength, full spectrum, cold-pressed CBD hemp oil, organically grown in the Greenbrier Valley of West Virginia. TO ORDER: Visit, call 681-207-9280 or see this background page.


DEAR DOUG REYNOLDS: An Open Letter On Your Pro-Pipeline Column: july13.2020: “One would think you might have had serious second thoughts about not revealing some key information in your pro-pipeline column. After all, you were standing in the bully pulpit of a newspaper that prided itself on shedding light into dark corners of conflicts of interest and spotlighting partial truths that mask self-interest.”

GUEST POST: The Not-So-Natural Gas Boom: aug10.2020: Natural gas and the fracking boom have changed the landscape, politics and economics of West Virginia. Sean O’Leary of the Ohio River Valley Institute addresses the claims of “a veritable rock star proponent of ‘the natural gas economy.’ And finds all nine of his “irrefutable energy truths,” in fact, quite refutable.

FREE SUBSCRIBE to WestVirginiaVille’s e-mail newsletter:


  • admin

    Very important point, Jim, and thank you for underscoring it. We must all remain vigilant to how politicians repping for extractive industries sow discord and sensationalism about climate remediation. Then, there are the radical rightist groups exploiting fears of regulation and the big changes needed to keep human life from a descent into the maesltrom from climate change: THIS SLATE STORY ADDRESSES some of this dynamic of this radicalization of the rhetoric around the climate, land and energy. It mentions Deb Halland, the Native American legislator about to take over the Dept of the Interior: “Republicans whose campaigns are bankrolled in no small part by extractive industries have turned to some familiar rhetoric to attack Haaland. GOP senators, including Montana’s Steve Daines, who has a history of railing against what he calls “fringe environmental extremists,” have painted Haaland as a “far-left ideologue” and “radical” threat to the American “way of life,” citing her support for the Green New Deal and previous statements opposing hydraulic fracturing, oil pipelines, and new fossil fuel leasing on federal lands.”

  • Jim Kotcon

    The fear in fossil fuel-dependent communities is that this needed clean energy transition will leave their communities behind. To assure a Just Transition, we need to provide incentives, or even mandates, that those new jobs in energy manufacturing are placed in the communities that have the most to lose.

Leave a Reply